Are we, the Church, protesting too much rather than understanding what Christ taught the apostles in Mark 9:40? “For the One whose is not against us is for us.” Like the men casting out demons in Christ’s name outside of Christ’s followers, perhaps its best we leave them alone and utilize the foundation of “inspiration” or “Interest” in Christ to formulate opportunities for us to expound on the Gospel.


George MacDonald, one of C.S. Lewis’ greatest influences, once wrote a fascinating little play called “The Light Princess.” It begins with somewhat familiar tropes. A king and queen have no heir, until finally they are blessed to conceive. In their joy, the king hand writes invitations to the girl’s christening and sends them out, but he neglects to send one to his sister, Makemnoit. Makemnoit is a clever, wise woman, it is explained, but also a witch. The lack of an invitation grates at her, so she decides to teach her brother a lesson.

At various times it has been said that a particular piece of music is the “song of our generation.” For the Boomers, it may well have been “Hey Jude” by the Beatles, or for Gen X, perhaps something like “Landslide” by Fleetwood Mac. It is, admittedly, hard to pick just one. But it is a fruitful exercise to look at the artistic output of an age, particularly its music, as a way of understanding its people, the associated dreams and hurts, and the zeitgeist itself.

There is some real false equivalence going on online right now surrounding the supposed moral incoherence of a religious exemption for the COVID vaccine due to the involvement of aborted cell lines and (in the case of the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines) human desecration and vivisection in the development of these vaccines. The truth is, there is a crucial difference between origin and later misuse that rends the arguments against religious exemption invalid.

That was a mouthful, so let’s break it down.